"A Spec 20 had been utilized to determine A 600 associated with the response mixtures confronted with light intensities of 1500, 750, and 350 uE/m2/sec just after chloroplasts had been added (Time 0) and each 2 min. thereafter through to the DCIP ended up being totally paid off. The A 600 of this no-light control ended up being calculated just at Time 0 and also at the finish associated with the experiment."
1. Function : The purpose of the outcomes part will be objectively provide your key outcomes, without interpretation, within an orderly and rational series making use of both text and illustrative materials (Tables and numbers). The outcome area always starts with text, reporting the results that are key talking about your numbers and tables while you continue. Summaries of this analytical analyses may appear in a choice of the written text (usually parenthetically) or in the appropriate Tables or Figures (in the legend or as footnotes towards the dining Table or Figure). The outcomes part should really be organized around Tables and/or numbers that needs to be sequenced to provide your key findings in an order that is logical. The writing for the outcomes part ought to be crafted to check out this series and highlight the proof had a need to respond to the questions/hypotheses you investigated. Crucial negative outcomes should be reported, too. Writers often compose the written text regarding the total outcomes area in relation to the series of Tables and numbers.
2. Style : create the text associated with the total results part concisely and objectively. The passive sound will probably take over right right right here, but make use of the active voice whenever possible. Utilize the past tense . Avoid repetitive paragraph structures. Try not to interpret the information right right here. The change into interpretive language may be a slope that is slippery. Look at the after two examples:
- This instance highlights the trend/difference that the writer wishes your reader to concentrate:
The extent of contact with water that is running a pronounced impact on cumulative seed germination percentages (Fig. 2). Seeds subjected to the treatment that is 2-day the best cumulative germination (84%), 1.25 times compared to the 12-h or 5-day teams and 4 times compared to settings. להמשיך לקרוא