I do believe the foundation of one's argument against me personally only at that true point is all about the problem over identification.

If it could be the full instance, perhaps it will be more fruitful for you really to go through the remainder of my remark, re: Paul’s page to your Colossians.

Or if you’d instead stay with 1 Cor. 6, then we could always dig deeper into the next component, where Paul gets into great information on how intercourse, union, and identification work: “13 The body is certainly not intended for intimate immorality, but also for the father, while the Lord when it comes to human anatomy. 14 By his energy Jesus raised the father through the dead, and then he will raise us also. 15 would you perhaps maybe not realize that your systems are users of Christ himself? Shall then i make the known people of Christ and unite all of them with a prostitute? Never! 16 can you perhaps maybe perhaps not understand which he whom unites himself having a prostitute is certainly one along with her in human anatomy? Because of it is stated, “The two can be one flesh. ” 17 But he whom unites himself with all the Lord is the one with him in nature. 18 Flee from intimate immorality. All the other sins a guy commits are outside their human anatomy, but he who sins sexually sins against his very own human anatomy. 19 Do you realy maybe perhaps perhaps not understand that the human body is a temple associated with the Holy Spirit, that is you have received from God in you, whom? You're not your very own; 20 you're purchased at a cost. Consequently honor Jesus together with your human anatomy. ”

Matthew Lee Anderson writes, “While Paul’s instant target is the matter of intercourse with prostitutes, their logic is rooted in Genesis as well as the nature of union of people we come across there. Paul’s basic belief is the fact that intimate union provides the other authority over your body. להמשיך לקרוא